Blog » Category: Community

Railing Panels Sneak Preview – Beacon Mountain

Posted May 10th, 2012 by Justin Martin

Construction work continues at Beacon Mountain, with features appearing and landforms taking more refined shape. Most recently, we’re excited to see the appearance of the custom interpretive railing panels that will flank the overlooks and canyon bridge. The panels consist of weathering steel with unique cutouts that will illustrate the on-site water cycle, historic changes in the course of the lower Duwamish River, and identify the peaks in the Olympic Mountain range visible on the western horizon.

Detail of the interpretive panels describing the water cycle at Beacon Mountain

 

An unmounted panel showing the profile of the Olympic Mountains at the peaks of The Brothers

The World’s Greenest Parking Lot?

Posted April 8th, 2011 by Brice Maryman

When students arrive on Olympic College’s campus, their education will begin in the most unlikely of place: the parking lot. Working with Schacht|Aslani Architects, SvR’s reconfiguration of this 260-stall space makes innovative stormwater management an integral part of the campus experience and a primary function of the parking area. With new swales, raingardens, and porous pavements, the parking lot reveals how natural processes can clean polluted runoff before it enters Puget Sound. The project is the first large investment in the campus following the completion of the College’s new Campus Master Plan in 2007.

Technical Performance

Knowing that the soils under the parking lot would allow for localized infiltration, SvR devised a strategy of distributed, small-scale attenuation opportunities. Our first tactic discouraged large volumes of water from accumulating in concentrated areas by incorporating porous pavements and cascading rain gardens throughout the site. Our team designed the system to infiltrate 100% of the water quality storm and the majority of the high-intensity storms, significantly exceeding code requirements. The project was also about creating a safer environment for students traveling from the parking lot to the campus core. Providing pedestrian-prioritization, we reduced the width of Broadway Avenue by six feet at two locations, connected to and improved existing bus stops, added LED lighting and created wide, raised crosswalks. ADA travel is also provided throughout the parking lot, and we have accommodated electric vehicle charging stations.

Design Performance

Through the designed landscape, we employed a variety of plantings to create buffers and provide screening of undesirable views. Since the relationship to the natural environment was so critical for the pedagogical program for the site, we opted for a design that prioritized a diversity of native, drought-tolerant plantings, particularly in the raingardens and swales. Our key challenge was to carefully site a wildlife-friendly palette of native plants that could withstand a variety of stormwater inundation regimes and adhere to CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles at the edge of the site. The final design uses primarily native wetland plant materials in areas that will be seasonally flooded, while upland varieties of broadleaf evergreen and deciduous plantings provide year-round seasonal interest, anchoring the drier, higher elevation areas.

Sustainable Sites (SITES™)

The Sustainable Sites Initiative™ (SITES™) selected the Olympic College Parking Lot as one of the 150 sites around the world to act as a case study in the program’s pilot phase, which will test and refine the SITES™ rating system for sustainable landscapes. As part of this evaluation, SvR will document the certification prerequisites and credits and compiled feedback for the SITES staff to inform the final rating system, which will be released in 2013. http://www.svrdesign.com/olympic_college.html

Street of the Week No. 8: Copenhagen’s Potato Rows

Posted February 4th, 2011 by Justin Martin

Streets for people is the name of the game in Copenhagen’s “potato rows” (Kartoffelrækkerne in Danish). This neighborhood, located in the Østerbro area of Copenhagen, derives its name from humble beginnings as housing for working-class families, yet the area has become a very popular and expensive place to live.

street in potato rows

The potato rows streets feature trees and other plantings that help slow traffic and provide other benefits such as urban greenery and summer shade.

The streets here are narrow, and place the focus on people and community as much as cars, using such features as plantings, raised and varied paving surfaces, and tables and chairs. Autos can still get through but must go very slowly. Bicycles are also used quite a bit, as the neighborhood is centrally located and easy to access other parts of the city by bike (as well as walking, transit, etc). At the middle of most blocks, a tree or other feature is placed in the middle of the street, and many have picnic tables, a stage, or other items there that help to turn the street into an outdoor living room for all the neighbors.

street in potato rows

A tree planted in the middle of the street calms traffic and discourages cut-through driving, sending a clear signal about the focus on the street as a place for people.

The streets have no curbs, but instead feature paver-lined runnels or gutters on either side. And while there are areas that would appear to be sidewalks, these are used in most cases for parking, again reinforcing the use of the center of the street as not only road but path and pedestrian walkway.

street in potato rows

Small front yards contribute to the green feel of the street, and blur the lines in the transition from private to public space.

Linking the Built Environment and Public Health

Posted January 31st, 2011 by Amalia

The SvR team has spent the last couple of months working with seven cities in King County – Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Kent, Redmond, SeaTac, and Snoqualmie. Along with Public Health – Seattle & King County, SvR is assisting these cities in developing strategies to improve the built environment while affecting positive health outcomes within theirc communities. The work is being funded through the Center for Disease Control as part of the Communities Putting Prevention to Work program.The goal of this effort is to encourage healthy eating and active living within these communities. Many communities throughout the country are looking at healthy eating and active living policies including other cities in Washington State, Colorado, New Hampshire, California, and Missouri.

SvR is teamed with Alta Planning + Design, CollinsWoerman, Martin and Sanders, and Triangle Associates. The SvR team is focusing on the connection between the built environment and health. Some strategies include increasing pedestrian and bicyclist connections and facilities, access to food, food choices, and access to parks and other recreation opportunities. Project deliverables for these communities range from Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning, Comprehensive Plan policy updates, and Food Access mapping.

Recently SvR, Alta Planning + Design, and CollinsWoerman visited Federal Way and Snoqualmie to further explore various neighborhoods with examples of existing conditions that the cities are proud of and areas that may need improvements to encourage active living. Visits to the other cities will be happening in February.

Federal Way – This intersection in Federal Way allows for pedestrian crossings between the two bus stops. The sidewalks provide connection to the adjacent residential and commercial area for pedestrians and transit riders. The SvR team is looking at opporunties to make similar improvements at other intersections. Photo: Alta Planning + Design

Federal Way – This intersection in Federal Way allows for pedestrian crossings between the two bus stops. The sidewalks provide connection to the adjacent residential and commercial area for pedestrians and transit riders. The SvR team is looking at opporunties to make similar improvements at other intersections. Photo: Alta Planning +Design

Snoqualmie – There is an active Safe Routes to School program in Snoqulamie. The City and the Snoqualmie Valley School District work together toidentify walking routes for students and their families. Many studies show that students who increase their physical activity throughout the day have improved health. Photo: SvR Design Company

Snoqualmie – There is an active Safe Routes to School program in Snoqulamie. The City and the Snoqualmie Valley School District work together toidentify walking routes for students and their families. Many studies show that students who increase their physical activity throughout the day have improved health. Photo: SvR Design Company

SvR is also coordinating with Cascade Bicycle Club to incorporate complete street principles into future transportation planning efforts, Puget Sound Regional Council to identify existing pedestrian and bicycle facilites in these communities, and with the Bicycle Alliance of Washington to coordinate the efforts of the participating school districts.

21st Street in Paso Robles, CA Recommended for $1M Grant

Posted November 24th, 2010 by Brice Maryman

California’s Strategic Growth Council has recommended that 21st Street in Paso Robles, CA receive nearly $1 million in funds to retrofit the streetscape so that it becomes a model of sustainable infrastructure.

Mountain Springs Creek will flow in the center median for a portion of the street

21st  Street is one of the four railroad crossings in Paso Robles, and is a major pedestrian connection between the residential neighborhood, schools and the parks. The critical design informant for our work on this street has been the presence of Mountain Springs Creek that currently runs below the street in a pipe. During heavy storms, creek boulders literally burst out of the pipes and into the street, requiring significant clean up.

As the road narrows to 50', Mountain Springs Creek will flow under a boardwalk before endering the Salinas River.

Working with E2 Inc., our proposed design daylights a portion of the stream, by creating a robust, vegetated channel that can accommodate 150 CFS of flow. Careful not to damage the creek with oil and heavy metals, we’ve proposed three different street cross-sections along the corridor so that we keep stream and stormwater flows separated. Since we are using native plants, over time a restored ecological program will take root, and this streetscape that will improve mobility, increase social capital and amplifye ecosystem services for the residents of the city.

The Strategic Growth Council will make the final decision on December 3. Good luck Paso Robles!

On Landscape Performance

Posted August 26th, 2010 by Brice Maryman

The Landscape Architecture Foundation just released the first two segments in it’s new Conversations with Leaders in Landscape to help inaugurate it’s Landscape Performance Series. The Foundation says, “The videos are part of a six-part series that features 20 distinguished leaders in the profession discussing landscape performance and sustainability.”

Enjoy this first one featuring our own Nate Cormier discussing landscape systems performance:

LPS #2: What is Landscape Performance? from LandscapeArchitecture Foundation on Vimeo.

A “Race to the Top” for Sustainable Communities

Posted July 22nd, 2010 by Brice Maryman

The Partnership for Sustainable Communities Dialogue

The University of Washington’s Runstad Center recently hosted a day-long event called the Partnership for Sustainable Communities Dialogue Session. The purpose, as was related to the 100 plus participants from the private sector, non-profits and governments, was to hear from interested partners about how to shape and inform the federal Partnership for Sustainable Communities, which was recently announced as a partnership between the United States Department of Transportation, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

After a day of dialogue, one of the most exciting tendrils of thought was the opportunity to use the carrot of federal funding to shift the regulatory/financial/governmental landscape across the country toward the principles that the smart growth and sustainability movements have been advocating for decades. The opportunity here is more than simply another federal grant. If deployed strategically, the work of the Partnership for Sustainable Communities could represent the tipping point in sustainable land use and transportation, much the way that the National Interstate and Defense Highways Act of 1956 was the tipping point that locked us into the land use and transportation patterns that we see today.

One need only look to Race to the Top funds from the United States Department of Education to see a successful example of how federal funding incentivizes significant, lasting legislative fixes to problems that would have been deemed intractable as little as a year ago.

For those unfamiliar with the Race to the Top program, The New York Times recently wrote a compelling article documenting the effect that it has had on the education system across the United States. They note:

“[Race to the Top] has turned a relatively modest federal program (the $4.3 billion budget represents less than 1 percent of all federal, state and local education spending) into high-yield leverage that could end up overshadowing health care reform in its impact…”

Across the country, enlightened self-interest drove unions to work with state legislatures. Democratic legislators who were reluctant to support charter schools were suddenly supportive, and teacher and principal accountability became a pre-requisite to even having a chance at receiving federal funding. In a highly-politicized Washington, DC, Obama administration officials even earned this accolade from the other side of the aisle:

“That President Obama did [education reform] is a total game changer,” says [Paul] Pastorek, the Louisiana schools superintendent, who is a Republican working for a Republican governor, Bobby Jindal. “If he really sticks to this, education will never be the same.”

The Sustainable Communities Partnership can be the same type of defining moment for re-shaping the built environment. Already, Secretary Donovan has announced that, “HUD will be using location-efficiency to score our grant applications.” But the grants are an opportunity to leverage even better returns from local and state governments.

To illustrate the point, let’s play an exercise of, “What if?”

What if to be competitive for federal Sustainable Communities funding, any state would need to:

  • have mode-neutral transportation funding (might Washington state’s gas tax be used for walking, biking and transit?);
  • require green stormwater infrastructure/low impact development for stormwater management;
  • have a state-level Complete Streets ordinance;
  • create a transfer of development rights market;
  • remove parking requirements;
  • include green house gas emissions forecasts in all projects;

If these were the requirements to effectively compete with other states for federal funds, what existing, rutted conversations could be overcome? What state-level legislative actions might such funding requirements encourage? The possibilities are, seemingly, endless. Let’s hope we use the opportunity wisely.

Zofnass = Sustainable Infrastructure? And Other Observations

Posted May 26th, 2010 by Tom von Schrader

Zofnass… I confess I had not heard of it, but then again some times you learn a thing or two from a conference. Recently, I came off of a tour of local and national conferences that took me from coast to coast and then to the heartland. Exhausting as that was, I came back with a renewed sense of purpose and several movements I thought I might share.

Boston, MA – Zofnass-ing…
In late April, I attended the Infrastructure Sustainability & Design Conference hosted by Zofnass Program for Infrastructure Sustainability at the Graduate School of Design at Harvard. The event centered on the Zofnass Sustainable Infrastructure Rating System. I confess the program was new to me, but I came away seeing the potential this rating system can have on large infrastructure projects.

At SvR, we approach projects by planning, designing, and recommending life-time solutions centered around green infrastructure components: mobility, water, community, habitat, energy, and geologic. Zofnass strikes me best as a system focused on large-scale developments. The rating system assesses the sustainability of a project over its entire life-cycle, from the need phase to rehabilitation, even decommissioning – cradle to grave. The system endeavors to quantify a project’s sustainability against national standards, local context, and benchmark projects. The program is seeking input and I encourage you to contact Brian Kenet at bkenet@gsd.harvard.edu to learn how you can contribute.

Branson, MO – Regenerating Streets
Cole and Associates of St. Louis, Missouri asked Civitas, Alta Planning and Design, and SvR Design Company to come and speak at the American Public Works Association – Missouri State Chapter spring conference; the topic – Regenerating the City Street. This remains a timely and important American topic (see our last blog post). Most American streets belong to cars – not communities. Think – where is a city’s identity, its first impression, a synthesis of their priorities reflected? Streets. Based on the conversation following our presentation, public works directors and city engineers in Missouri municipalities are seeing how critical their streets are. You can download our presentation on our resources page.

San Francisco, CA – Cost/Benefit Calculator
City officials, consulting engineers, and professors from around the world (Korea to United Kingdom) gathered in San Francisco in mid-April for the American Society of Civil Engineers 2010 International Low Impact Development Conference. SvR was honored to give two presentations (see our resources page for the presentations). Aside from our presentations, one presentation stood out. The Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT) out of Chicago presented their efforts to develop a cost/benefits calculator for green infrastructure systems. Our industry lacks cost/benefits data, which would be valuable to present to clients considering these systems. The calculator is getting off the ground but needs data. Again, I encourage you to contact CNT to learn how you can contribute data.

Final Observation…
Coming back from these conferences, I was refreshed by the aggregate passion for a healthy society. I am also struck by the reality – on a global level – for a necessary seawind of change to preserve our planet and reclaim infrastructure for the benefit and use of our communities. The grassroots movement exists. What is our movement’s next step? How can we catalyze change that remains?

One word: Policy.

Alley Enterprise Zones

Posted April 29th, 2010 by Justin Martin

As we have become a more compact city, there is a re-examination of spaces of all kinds within urban environments.  In the City of Seattle, almost 25% of the surface area of the city lies within public right-of-way areas; in the Central Business District that number increases to 35%.  One significant but often-overlooked piece of the urban right-of-way is the alley.

Alleys have historically earned a somewhat dubious reputation; for many they conjure images of dirty, dark places, attracting unsavory characters and activities. But with increasing urbanization, alleys present great opportunity to create a more vibrant, healthy and sustainable urban environment – if we can rise to the occasion and implement ideas that breathe life into these forgotten spaces, while still maintaining their key utilitarian functions.

Similar transformations are already taking shape in various other cities.  Chicago has incorporated natural drainage to help clean the runoff from its urban areas through its Green Alleys program.  On the other side of the globe, Sydney, Australia is integrating arts and culture into its alleys (known there as laneways), with a recent temporary art installation project that is part of a larger government revitalization program. A popular movement to reclaim and revitalize laneways in the city’s Newtown neighborhood staged a parade and party that traversed and energized the area’s alleys.

Recently, Seattle held a design competition to generate ideas and public interest in a new vision for the city’s alleys. The competition focused particularly on the downtown core, inviting participants to envision “…potential new uses that in combination could add functionality to our transportation and ecological systems as well as improving the aesthetic and community-building elements of our City.” This new frame for viewing alleys builds on similar thought for all components of the built environment: we must continually design spaces and systems that are resilient and multi-functional, adapting to different uses and users at different times. Such places should foster environmental health as well as enrich the human spirit.

Alley perspective, south end – features such as an added seating balcony and walk-up windows help bring pedestrians and business to the Alley Enterprise Zone

In considering how to achieve these goals, our team decided that we needed incentives to help private business use and improve Seattle’s alleyways. We developed the idea of “Alley Enterprise Zones,” areas in which special city rules would be applied to blocks of alleys to spur the improvements there. The Enterprise Zones would achieve the alley improvements through a continuous feedback loop: The city gives tax breaks to landowners and small businesses with storefronts or main entries along the alley; a portion of the remaining taxes that those businesses pay would go into a fund dedicated toward alley improvements in their enterprise zone; the new businesses and ensuing improvements to the alley would help draw visitors and customers, thus supporting further business growth and development, further alley improvements, and so on.

These smaller-scaled pedestrian-friendly businesses seem ideal to provide places to gather and relax, and would support the growth of a potential secondary pedestrian network through the web of the city. In so doing, they increase the “granularity” of the city – a term used by our friend Liz Dunn to describe the tightness of scenes and experiences in the urban landscape. These alley-front locations also offer an incubation zone for niche businesses & entrepreneurs.

So how do we draw more people into the alleys, making them hospitable, safe places to visit while also increasing their environmental performance? To answer this question we developed a toolbox of solutions that designers and the community could draw on in transforming each alley. Bending the rules of the competition, we chose to focus on “our” alley for our design proposal.

At the southern end of the alley, new food service or other businesses could locate in the now vacant alley-front real estate and take advantage of outdoor seating opportunities during lunch and dinner hours.  Setting fixed delivery and trash pickup hours for the alley would provide a time at which one end of the alley could be shut down to vehicles to allow it to be used for café and restaurant seating (while maintaining vehicular access from the north end). An awning that folds down from the building’s façade during dining hours could provide shelter and evening lighting, adding to the transformed ambiance of the space.  A simple deck built out over the adjacent sloping parcel would provide seating space even during times the alley’s south end is open to vehicles, and provide an additional income source for the property’s owner.

Alley perspective, north end – video projection and solar reflectors add light and dynamism to the alley experience, while a green wall and planted/pervious paving help clean and store rainwater

The northern end of the alley is more enclosed, with taller buildings on either side. Solar reflectors and a projected video and still-frame art installation would add more light and dynamism to the space. A kinetic green wall would detain stormwater runoff from the large roof area of the adjacent buildings. Additional stormwater detention and treatment capacity would be gained by adding planted porous paving to portions of the alley driving lane. Ideally these on-site natural drainage systems could be engineered with enough subsurface capacity to allow disconnecting of the buildings’ roof downspouts from the city’s overtaxed combined sewer system.

The interventions to transform the city’s alleys do not need to be overly complex or expensive, and can be tackled incrementally. Many of the individual elements of the design proposed in our entry could be applied to other alleys. Likewise all of the Green Alleys Competition entries included many good ideas, centered around Pioneer Square’s Nord Alley but also more broadly applicable. Creating a regulatory framework that supports alley improvements, such as that proposed with Alley Enterprise Zones, would be one way for cities to move forward with a low-cost solution that encourages sustainable development through local business, green infrastructure, and vibrant urban places.

Copenhagen III: Do we Dane?

Posted April 16th, 2010 by phil_miller

Part Three:  Bringing the lessons back home

What makes cycle track development so interesting and timely is that we have heard a growing chorus of local urbanists advocating a similar cycle track approach for Seattle bicyclists.  In our earlier posts, we looked at Danish practice and later at the challenges of translating that practice to our transportation system.

Without question, one of the primary challenges in “Copenhagenizing” our bicycle transportation system is cultural – Danish and American bicyclists have distinctly different notions of their place in traffic.  While the Danes have placed bicycle transportation on a higher plane than automobiles with relative ease, they have done so with the assistance of both a very cooperative terrain and urban form, and a population of bicyclists not as vested in having the same rights and access to streets as our advocates have sought for many years.

Danish Soldiers Waiting at a Red Light

Challenging Assumptions

If we accept that moving our bicycling share of trips from less than 4% to a more Danish 33%, then many values are going to be challenged throughout our community.  Getting to 33% means reaching a lot of people who are currently unwilling or unable to ride, and particularly those who see urban bicycling as not worth the perceived effort or risk.  If we can address some of the design concerns listed below, the cycletrack may very well serve a major role in re-shaping Seattle for a vastly greater number of bicyclists.

Traffic Counter

Traffic Counter

What is an appropriate design speed, and what will US bicyclists tolerate and/or demand?

Without question, the Copenhagen cycle system operates with significantly slower user speeds than we see here in Seattle or in other American cities.  (“Green Wave” streets with optimized signal timing for bicyclists in Denmark are set for a 20kph – 12mph – speed, while the 85th percentile speed on the Burke Gilman Trail has hovered around 17-18 mph for years). Certainly, land use and trip distance is a major factor in how citizens use the Danish system; on the billiard table-flat network of Copenhagen, it is not necessary to have a fancy bike or to exert oneself unnecessarily to get around.  Trips are short in time and distance, and the bike is merely a convenient tool to be used in daily life, not a symbol of what makes the user a unique individual.  Our cyclists have to ride farther and (in this city) over significant terrain, making the financial and perhaps emotional investment more significant here.  If trip distances are short and the end of trip facilities convenient, then it may be possible to convince new users that a slower but shorter trip with low cost and high convenience by bike is more attractive than cars or even public transit.

Urban Cycling in the Snow

Urban Cycling in the Snow

How long must a facility be to be considered effective?

A similar issue for us in Seattle to the design speed question is the degree to which a cycle track network must be established to develop a constituency that sustains and motivates future implementation efforts.  The Danish started on the busiest streets with high population and employment densities – a wise move for us, as it will point the way to facility development on the very streets which most intimidate potential new bicyclists (and which don’t currently accommodate our experienced bicyclists). What remains to be determined is the length of a corridor needed to provide the desired continuity of a trip for these targeted riders – while facility characteristics can be expected the change over the course of a journey, continuity is generally considered desirable.

How will the loss of existing routes be seen by the types of commuters and other bicyclists we see today?

The development of cycle tracks (and the necessary legal framework to govern their operation) may well antagonize a number of the bicyclists who currently use Seattle streets as cycle networks, and who may view Copenhagen’s rules for cycle tracks to be a step backwards from long-held beliefs that bicycles are an equal partner in traffic.  Bicycle advocacy organizations have maintained a concern that mandatory bicycle facility-use rules will create in motorists a belief that bicyclists never really belong on roads.  Again, placing cycle tracks on corridors that do not currently accommodate formal bike facilities (bike lanes) may offset some of this concern, but the cost in disruption to existing norms of use on these streets makes their location as the FIRST cycle track in the city somewhat problematic.

Can a variety of facilities be developed in a pattern that serves existing populations while reaching out to new users who would potentially be attracted to a slower, separated facility?

Ultimately, cycle tracks will become (as they have in Copenhagen and other European cities) one tool among many that can be deployed in an effort to expand the utility of bicycle travel to new and larger populations of users.  There are bike lanes and sharrows and separated trails in Denmark, too, and finding the right combination and integration of these devices has a demonstrable potential to increase our already-growing population of bicyclists.

Lessons (to be) Learned

  1. Early US cycletrack design efforts need to increase the effort to not just separate bikes from cars, but also pedestrians.
  2. We need to determine if the preferred design is a two-way track on one side of the street, or a pair of one-way facilities running with other traffic – there are access and conflict issues associated with both types of facilities that will require consideration before implementation on US streets
  3. The ability to implement new bicycle facility types should increase with civic commitment to a “complete streets” approach to capital improvement projects, thus addressing the whole of the street and user demands in an integrated design effort.
  4. Additional effort and attention must be placed on the effectiveness of signalization and channelization protocols designed to address “right hooks” and other bike/car, bike/transit, and bike pedestrian conflicts typically associated with separated facilities.
  5. Maintain awareness of risks associated with vertical design elements too close to the cycle track and user.